In the first chapter of Animal Rights/Human Rights, David Nibert presents a model of oppression I have found helpful to work with. For me, it offers a broader context in which to make sense of my experiences. I encourage you to consider this model and test if it resonates with your own experiences of oppression.

According to this model (this is a slight modification of Nibert), the same three factors create the conditions for and perpetuate oppression of any sort:

Function Factor
Motivation Psychological or material gain
Capability Unequal power distribution
Justification Ideological control (including speciesism and other isms)

.

As an example, the use of non-human animals in zoos may be understood through this model: patrons of the zoo may be motivated by the desire for entertainment; humans, through our supremacy over non-humans, are able to force non-humans to be our captives; and we justify that imprisonment under the guise of conservation, education, and altruism (“they’re safer in zoos than in the wild”).

What I find particularly interesting about this model is that the conventional understanding of speciesism as the cause of speciesist oppression is turned around; speciesism is understood to be a natural product of speciesist oppression. This is important and worth repeating. According to this model, speciesist ideology, such as the idea that human animals are superior to non-human animals, does not cause speciesist oppression; instead, we create these ideas to justify our exploitation of non-humans for psychological or material gain.

This model considers oppression to be a systemic phenomenon, beyond mere individual prejudice. This focus on the system rather than the individual is one of the primary characteristics of the anti-oppression understanding. As well, these factors support each other, so once they are in place, they strengthen each other, creating a cycle that perpetuates oppression.

This model offers a simple structure to complement an experiential understanding of oppression and may be used to help bring clarity when analyzing situations. And so, when confronting the latest atrocity, this model can help us keep our bearings; remember that the individual is caught up in the system; and focus on the illness (the oppressive system) rather than the symptom (the individual act). By understanding the mechanics of the operation of oppression, we can better understand our own role in various systems of oppression and be more effective in our efforts to end them.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter